How To Start Working On The Evaluation Part Of Thesis

In all thesis degrees, in order to maintain the quality standards of research, the examiners must evaluate the thesis. For the evaluation part of thesis, there is a pre-defined set of criteria. Such criteria help examiners in either passing or failing a thesis. Based on this evaluation part of thesis, students find whether their thesis is ready to be submitted or not. Furthermore, the criteria confirm whether all chapters of a thesis contain their necessary parts. Besides, it explains the source criteria to ensure the quality of the resources used in a study. At last, the evaluation form defines the marking scale or rules for a fair assessment of each master’s or doctoral thesis. This article will describe the evaluation criteria in general, source credibility criteria and other important aspects of thesis evaluation.

Evaluation Criteria For Master’s/ Doctoral Level Thesis

A thesis written in any language has to follow a certain set of criteria that every student should abide by independently. Further, the evaluation part of thesis is based on the policies of the diploma school from where a student is getting a research degree. In addition to the rules set by the institute, the laboratory and program specific criteria also have a great impact on the evaluation part of thesis. A few general rules among them in a step-wise manner are as follows:

For a master’s/doctoral level evaluation part of thesis, the checklist starts from the justification of the topic. A well-defined and clear thesis topic is the first checkpoint for a supervisor to move forward. After the title, the second most important evaluation part is a well-organised introduction. Once your title seems perfect to the supervisor, he/she moves on to see whether the introductory chapter contains all the necessary information.

Here, the necessary information includes the background, rationale, significance, and research questions to be answered in a systematic manner. After the introduction in the thesis evaluation, it is important to check all the vital components of the literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion relative to a standard format. Hence, the evaluation part of thesis checks the quality of each chapter in general and its components in particular.

After testing each chapter and its components, the evaluation part of thesis deals with certain quality checks like research or analysis assurance. These quality assurance steps ensure whether a researcher logically organises different components of introduction. Besides, at this step, the examiner critically investigates the facts, evidences and sources. The presence of reasons for the selection or rejection of different research approaches in methodology also indicates the thesis quality standards.

Moreover, the coordination or relevancy of the data gathered or represented in textual, tabular or graphical forms in a thesis is also important. Before the end, the second last step in the evaluation part of thesis is to test the originality as well as the credibility of the findings of a research. Lastly, the evaluation criteria end on cross-checking of the references and accomplishment of research ethics.

Source Evaluation Criteria For A Thesis

The evaluation part of thesis passes through a number of checkpoints to ensure the quality of research as well. According to the UK quality code for higher education research degrees, the reliability or validity of the research sources are of prime importance for all research degree programs. Mostly, the list of credible sources includes books, scientific papers (published in the last few years) and credible websites. Among all, the toughest step in the evaluation part of thesis is testing the reliability of the web sources. The following steps shared by expert writers of a thesis writing service will guide you on how to test the reliability of the resources in thesis.

Investigate Who Wrote A Source

While considering web content as a source of information for your thesis, the first thing to be noticed is the writer. To put it in another way, you need to investigate who wrote a specific paper, whether he/she is a field expert, a professor, a research scholar, or a novel person. The more you know about the writer, the more confident you will be about the reliability of the source.

Guess The Rationale Why It Was Written

If the web content is written by an authentic person, you can consider it after investigating the reason for publication. There are many reasons for writing web content. You need to answer whether the content belongs to an original research source or a result of a political agenda. Plus, the credibility of the blogs or articles published for commercial purposes is also doubtful. As a result, another best way to judge the credibility of the web source is to guess its purpose of publication.

What Is The Date Of Publication?

The date of publication of web content is as important as the investigation about the writers and purpose of publication. With time, the new researches and facts take place by supplementing or replacing the previous ones. So, the date of publication helps researchers in including the most updated information in a thesis.

Thesis Evaluation Format

The last step in the evaluation part of thesis is to award marks. For this, the jury follows a thesis evaluation form. According to the standard format of the thesis evaluation form, it consists of two main parts. Part A contains a few aspects that are effective enough to evaluate the quality of the thesis. In front of each aspect, the examiner has to mark either a tick or a cross with proper justification. Likewise, part B contains some quality aspects to be monitored in the evaluation part of thesis. For further understanding, the following are some important quality aspects in each part:

Part A:

• Is the topic or introduction of a thesis precise?
• Are the hypotheses innovative or creative?
• Is the thesis well-structured or well-researched?
• Whether the researcher applied innovative tools, methods and ways of studying?
• Is the research original or effective for the academic sphere?
• What is the significance of the research?
• Can the research serve as a prototype?
• Has the research enough potential to be published in scientific papers with a good impact factor
• How important will research be for the nation or society?
• Can we expand the current research in future?

Part B:
Here the examiner uses a well-defined scale to evaluate some quality aspects of the thesis. The aspects of being evaluated at this part contain:

• The quality of the sources a researcher included in a study.
• The writing and presentation skills of the student are explicated by the thesis.
• The practicability of the methods, analysis and data gathering techniques adopted to conduct the research.
• The information used in the thesis is credible, properly analysed and updated.
• The test result presented in a thesis is well-evaluated, authentic and thoroughly reviewed.
• The conclusion was well-constructed, well-drafted and logical.

In front of each of these aspects, the examiners tick an appropriate option from the scaling system. The scaling system in most of the thesis evaluation form consists of the following options:

• Excellent
• Very good
• Good
• Fair
• Poor

Hence, the evaluation part of thesis consists of multiple aspects. There is a certain set of rules that help examiners in making evaluation criteria. In general, these criteria judge the quality standards of the thesis in this evaluation process. Among all necessary quality checks, the credibility of the sources, especially web content, is a crucial step. Apart from all, for examiners, there is a proper thesis evaluation form that monitors all quality aspects for scoring a thesis.